@dangerdyke @charlotte @ben but like . not rlly tho ? one can spin up a full atp stack , bsky interoperable , without that much exoense , the implementation just needs to do some clever things like : only storing data from places u actually care about n follow (=> breaking some threads just like with AP)
see how wafrn does it for example
i agree that bsky is corpo shitware but tge fact that their implementation of atp is shit doesnt make atp "badly designed" , in fact it is very versatile , even tho i also prefer a simpler protocol like ap since it makes things more straightforward